Debunking email hoaxes and exposing Internet scams since 2003!


Hoax-Slayer Logo Hoax-Slayer Logo

DividerDivider
Home    About    New Articles    RSS Feed    Subscriptions    Contact
DividerDivider
Bookmark and Share









Issue 139 - September 2012 (2ndt Edition) - Page 18

Circulating Image Implies Heineken Supports Dog Fighting

Issue 139 Start Menu

Previous Article            Next Article

Outline
Widely circulated image shows a dog fight with a row of Heineken banners visible in the background.



Brief Analysis
The picture is genuine, but Heineken had no knowledge of the dog fighting event and does not endorse or promote dog fighting in any way. The Heineken banners were left in the venue - a nightclub in Mongolia - after an unrelated promotional event the previous night and their presence is not an indication that Heineken supported the dog fighting activity. The venue's management failed to remove the banners before the dog fight was staged reportedly because staff did not have time to do so between the two events. Heineken has since ceased its relationship with the club and ensured that its products will never be sold there again. Heineken is not guilty of the accusations laid against it and sending on this misleading image is unfair and counterproductive.

Bookmark and Share
Detailed analysis and references below example.





Scroll down to submit comments
Last updated: September 4, 2012
First published: September 4, 2012
Article written by Brett M. Christensen
About Brett Christensen and Hoax-Slayer


Example
Heineken Dog Fight Protest

Please SHARE THE HELL out of this image. Big mistake Heineken, BIG mistake.




Detailed Analysis
This viral image, which depicts a dog fight in progress while a row of Heineken banners hang in the background has generated a great deal of anger and consternation against the famous Dutch brewer . At first glance, the presence of the banners may suggest to viewers that Heineken is thereby actively promoting and supporting the dog fight. The message asks users to share the image as widely as possible to highlight Heineken's "big mistake" in its apparent endorsement of such a cruel and reviled activity.

But, things are not what they seem. The photograph is genuine, but Heineken had no knowledge of the depicted dog fighting event and its banners are not associated with the event in any way. The banners were left displayed in the venue by its management after a totally unrelated Heineken promotion the night before. The dog fighting event was staged at a Mongolian nightclub in 2010. Heineken has denied any involvement or support of the dog fighting event and has responded to the rumors via a statement on its Facebook Page. The statement reads in part:

Images continue to circulate in social media channels showing a dog fight, with Heineken banners clearly visible in the background. This is very distressing and totally unacceptable. As a company and a brand owner, we do not and would never knowingly support any event, outlet or individual involved in this type of activity. It is against our company and brand rules and - more important - against our company values.
Since this matter was brought to our attention via Facebook we have conducted an investigation and now know that

Heineken has now ceased its relationship with the club entirely and taken steps to ensure that its products will never be sold there again.

The nightclub owner has also issued an official statement in which he claims that the banners were left up from a previous event because staff did not have time to remove them. He also confirms that the dog fight was not sponsored by Heineken.

Thus, this would-be protest message is directing its angst against the wrong entity. Heineken does not support dog fighting and circulating this misleading protest message is unfair and will do nothing to help stamp out such cruel activities. And perhaps a lesson to the growing hordes who use social media to promote various causes, often without conducting even the most rudimentary research into the veracity of said causes. Supporting a genuine cause you believe in? Fine! Failing to spend a few minutes checking the truth of a protest message before reposting it? BIG mistake!

Bookmark and Share


References

Statement Update: Images of dog fighting circulating on the internet
Statement from Club Owner



Previous Article            Next Article

Issue 139 Start Menu

Pages in this issue:
  1. PayPal 'Refund Pending' Phishing Scam
  2. Tom Kenny, Voice of SpongeBob Is NOT Dead
  3. Facebook Post Claims Dog Saved Puppies From House Fire
  4. HM Revenue & Customs Income Tax Repayment Phishing Scam
  5. Did Samsung Pay a $1 Billion Fine to Apple in 5 Cent Coins?
  6. Student Finance England 'Payment Cancelled' Phishing Scam
  7. All-In-One Shopping Voucher Malware
  8. Morgan Freeman is NOT Dead
  9. NatWest 'Account Locked' Phishing Scam
  10. 'Causes' Petition Calling To End Using Dogs As Shark Bait
  11. Young Football Player Not Allowed to Wear Pink Gloves For Breast Cancer
  12. Photo Sharing Request for 'Pray For Rosalie'
  13. Misleading Warning about Missed Calls From +375 and +371 Numbers
  14. 'Catholic Charities Organization' Money Laundering Scam
  15. Facebook Survey Scam - Free $500 Woolworths Gift Voucher
  16. 'Windows Live Update' Sector Zero Virus Hoax
  17. Killer Piranha Attack Images
  18. Circulating Image Implies Heineken Supports Dog Fighting
  19. Another Sick Baby Hoax - Like, Comment or Share to Help Baby With Large Mass on Her Back
  20. ACMA 'Security Upgrade' Phishing Scam
  21. 'Circle of Safety' - Child Stuck in Wheel Well Photograph
  22. American Express 'Security Verification' Phishing Scam