
|
Enter your email address to subscribe to the Hoax-Slayer Newsletter: |
Last updated: November 13, 2012
First published: November 13, 2012
Article researched and written by David M. White
About Hoax-Slayer

This is being pursued, ironically enough, through an outlet that was set up by the Obama administration in 2011 – the We The People website. Petitions submitted via that page are directed to the current administration's policy experts. Petitions that gain a minimum of 25,000 signatures in a 30 day period will be reviewed by officials in the Administration and an official response issued.
Already it should be evident that these petitions are rather pointless. Those petitions aren’t any form of legally binding document and aren’t even directed to any elected officials.
However, it does raise the question of the legitimacy and process by which a state might secede from the US. The simplest answer is that, barring an outright revolution – and a successful one - they can’t. And even during rebellion, a state is considered part of the union. That legal question was decided all the way back in 1869 in the case Texas v. White: The Court held that individual states could not unilaterally secede from the Union and that the acts of the insurgent Texas legislature--even if ratified by a majority of Texans--were "absolutely null." http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0074_0700_ZO.html
A more modern take on the question was supplied by Supreme Court of the United States Associate Justice Antonin Scalia – the anchor of the conservative wing of SCOTUS who was appointed by Reagan in 1986 and is currently the longest serving justice on that court. In replying to a screenwriter who was writing a comedy about Maine seceding and joining Canada, he wrote, “…I cannot imagine that such a question could ever reach the Supreme Court. To begin with, the answer is clear. If there was any constitutional issue resolved by the Civil War, it is that there is no right to secede. (Hence, in the Pledge of Allegiance, “one Nation, indivisible.”) Secondly, I find it difficult to envision who the parties to this lawsuit might be. Is the State suing the United States for a declaratory judgment? But the United States cannot be sued without its consent, and it has not consented to this sort of suit.”
In short, these are just the result of likeminded individuals venting their frustration with the current state of affairs.
Last updated: November 13, 2012
First published: November 13, 2012
Article researched and written by David M. White
About Hoax-Slayer